Use case
What content should I create?
Short answer
Content worth creating covers a topic people actually search for, that your site doesn’t answer yet, that competitors already cover and that connects to your business goals. Weighing these four signals together turns “what should we write this week?” from a gut call into a decision backed by data.
Content to create: candidates
Sample data| Topic | Search volume | Priority | Suggested action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B SaaS onboarding e-mails | 1,900 | High | Create | |
| Product-led blog examples | 1,300 | High | Create | |
| How to write a customer success story | 720 | Medium | Create | |
| Content calendar template | 590 | Medium | Create | |
| SaaS content strategy guide | 2,400 | High | Refresh |
B2B SaaS onboarding e-mails
- Search volume:
- 1,900
- Priority:
- High
- Suggested action:
- Create
Product-led blog examples
- Search volume:
- 1,300
- Priority:
- High
- Suggested action:
- Create
How to write a customer success story
- Search volume:
- 720
- Priority:
- Medium
- Suggested action:
- Create
Content calendar template
- Search volume:
- 590
- Priority:
- Medium
- Suggested action:
- Create
SaaS content strategy guide
- Search volume:
- 2,400
- Priority:
- High
- Suggested action:
- Refresh
Why is this question hard?
Plenty of ideas, little time
New topic ideas come up every week. Which ones match real demand is often unclear, so the pick goes to whoever argues loudest.
Overlap with existing content
A new article can target the same search intent as a page that already has visibility. The two pages get in each other’s way and both stay weak.
No link to business goals
Not every topic that brings traffic relates to your product or sales process. Visits go up, but you don’t reach the right people.
Four signals to check before you create
A single metric is misleading. Together, these four signals show whether a topic is worth creating.
Search demand
Do people actually search for it? Look at the cluster of related queries, not a single keyword. A topic searched for steadily through different questions points to a lasting need.
Coverage gap
Is there a page on your site that answers this search intent? If so, refreshing that page or strengthening it with internal links may make more sense than new content.
Competitor signal
Who is visible for this topic, and how deeply have they covered it? Areas competitors cover but you leave empty are the clearest opportunities.
Business fit
Does the topic connect to the problem your product solves, your audience and your conversion steps? If the link is weak, high demand alone doesn’t justify the priority.
Step by step: decide what content to create
This process turns a scattered list of ideas into a short priority list your team can actually publish.
Do you have a page that answers this search intent?
No
New content, if demand and business fit are strong enough
Yes
Does the page answer this search intent well?
No
RefreshYes
Internal linkGrowado recommends; your team approves, edits or holds.
1. Gather candidate topics
Bring ideas from search data, customer questions, sales calls and competitor content together in one list.
2. Match them against existing content
For each candidate, check whether you already have a page that answers the same intent. If you do, it moves from the “create” list to the “refresh” or “internal link” list.
3. Prioritise by the four signals
Rank the remaining candidates as High, Medium or Low by search demand, coverage gap, competitor signal and business fit.
4. Set an owner and a measurement window
Give every topic an owner. Write down up front what you’ll review after publishing, and when — for example, after 60 or 90 days.
5. Record the decision and the outcome
Seeing what changed after each piece of content puts your next decision about what to create on firmer ground.
With Growado
How does Growado make this decision easier?
Growado brings your search data, existing content, competitor signals and business goals together, and gives a recommendation with its reasoning for every candidate topic. Your team decides: approve, edit or hold the recommendation.
- Recommends a refresh or an internal link instead of new content when you already have a page answering the same intent.
- Shows the data, the assumption and the measurement window behind every recommendation.
- Tracks what changed after publishing in the decision log.
Common mistakes
Looking only at search volume
A high-volume topic unrelated to your business eats your team’s time and doesn’t bring the right visitors.
Writing without checking existing content
Two pages targeting the same intent can split each other’s visibility in search results.
Publishing without defining success
If what you’ll measure isn’t clear up front, whether the content worked becomes a debate later.
Frequently asked questions
Is it worth creating content for a low-volume topic?
It can be: low-volume queries with strong buying intent can bring visitors who are close to your product. Weigh volume alongside business fit and competition, not on its own.
Should I create new content or update an existing page?
If you have a page that answers the same search intent, consider updating it first. A new page makes sense when the intent is genuinely different.
How many content ideas should I work on at once?
As many as your team can actually publish. A short, clear priority list is more useful than a long one that never gets finished.
When should I review how a piece of content performed?
The effect of organic content shows up over time. Set the review window before publishing, and read the outcome at the end of that window against the measures you defined in advance.
Answer this question with your own data.
Growado weighs your search data, content and goals together, shows each recommendation with its evidence and leaves the decision to your team.
Join the early-access list- Free early access
- Sign up with your work e-mail
- Priority access at launch